Gaiash's Web Channel

brain-drops-soul-winks:

I knew it all along- Daniel is cosplaying Marko from Saga.

Maybe horns are accidental, but the hoodie? No way. :P

muchadoaboutallthethings:

Saga getting too real.

muchadoaboutallthethings:

Saga getting too real.

deducecanoe:

paulsrockinpagoda:

noswellicus:

Yesssss

nooooooooooooo

Every time science discovers something that science fiction has already determinedd is a bad idea, I’m like… HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING!?

deducecanoe:

paulsrockinpagoda:

noswellicus:

Yesssss

nooooooooooooo

Every time science discovers something that science fiction has already determinedd is a bad idea, I’m like… HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING!?

mercuryolie:

Gender Stereotypes (x)

pingass:

My blood is boiling waiting for s2 i swear

pingass:

My blood is boiling waiting for s2 i swear

perfectionstoomainstream:

I’ve saved this since March to post.

perfectionstoomainstream:

I’ve saved this since March to post.

bizarro-sai:

actualmenacebuckybarnes:

micdotcom:

Fans are taking ‘Where’s Gamora?’ into their own hands

As many frustrated fans have pointed out online, much of the official Guardians of the Galaxy merchandise leaves out Gamora, one of the movie’s five titular Guardians, played by Zoe Saldana. Though Gamora has an equal amount of screen time as her male colleagues, and Saldana is second-billed after Chris Pratt, Gamora is mysteriously absent in some egregious ways.

Unfortunately, this is nothing new

apparently boys can’t wear pictures of women on their shirts

as opposed to women … who also aren’t allowed to wear pictures of women on their shirts

ARE there gotg shirts made for women?? 

You should groveling in shame, Children’s Place. Burn ‘em, internet. Burn ‘em good.

Seems the only place I can buy good Marvel shirts is WeLoveFine, which I like but it can be pretty expensive.

beterlucknextime:

 cyaneko | 「サトシ、久し振りかも!」

berrrystrawberry:

Naruto ♥ Hinata
(✿◠‿◠) OTP's gif sets
A Proposed General Rule about Pictures of Naked People

fishingboatproceeds:

fishingboatproceeds:

I mean, I’m not saying that we can enforce this as law or anything. I also might be wrong about this. But:

Just as a general rule, I feel like we should not look at pictures of the breasts or genitalia of people who would rather we not look at pictures of their breasts or genitalia.

As a corollary to that general rule, I would add that I don’t see anything wrong with looking at pictures of breasts or genitalia of people who have invited us to do so. There seem to be plenty such pictures for us to get a reasonably good grasp of, like, the diversity of unclothed human anatomy without having to look at people who wish we wouldn’t.

This seems pretty straightforward to me. Yes, the photographer(s) who photographed Kate Middleton’s grainy distant breasts were violating her privacy. But so do people who choose to look at those pictures.

So maybe we can just agree not to? And this goes not only for princesses, I would argue, but also for people who send things to their romantic partners, who turn out to be jerks and release those photos publicly. Or people whose phones are hacked. etc.

In this world where most every curiosity can be satiated, it seems to me genuinely heroic to resist the urge to look at everything that can be seen, and instead to respect the wishes of those who feel violated or hurt by the availability of images they wish were private.

Seemed a good day to reblog this.

exty:

com for my homie

exty:

com for my homie

stevenmwc:

sam-winchester-cries-during-sex:

lunar-bunnie:

my

image

don’t want 

image

unless you’ve got

image

image

my snake don’t want habit unless you’ve got rabbits mulan protagonist

So close, but that’s the antagonist.

And his name is Shan Yu.